In this hypothetical example, an aggressive portfolio allocated 80% of its assets to stocks, with another 10% in cash and 10% in bonds.
The hypothetical conservative portfolio had only 60% in cash with the remainder divided between stocks and bonds—20% each.
Over the past 20 years, the aggressive portfolio was volatile. In its best year, it returned 24.3%; in its worst it lost -29.3%. Overall, it averaged a 6.2% annual rate of return for the period.
In its best year, the conservative portfolio returned 8.1%; in its worst, it lost -7.1%. And over 20 years, it averaged a 3.7% annual rate of return.
So what’s better? That depends on your individual situation. However, the difference between a 6.2% return and a 3.7% return can add up over time.
Stocks are represented by the S&P 500 Composite Index (total return), an unmanaged index that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Bonds are represented by the Citigroup Corporate Bond Composite Index, an unmanaged index that is generally considered representative of the U.S. bond market. Cash is represented by the Citigroup 3-Month Treasury-Bill Index, an unmanaged index that is generally considered representative of the U.S. cash market. Index performance is not indicative of the past performance of a particular investment. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Individuals cannot invest directly in an index.
Source: Thomson Reuters, 2019